QUICK SUMMARY
Seattle Councilmember Cathy Moore considers revising the City’s ethics rules to enhance transparency in legislative voting. Proposed changes would mandate full disclosure of potential financial conflicts by Councilmembers, allowing them to decide on recusal. This shift aims to clarify the distinction between interests that require recusal and those that do not.
Seattle Councilmember Cathy Moore plans to revise the City’s ethics rules following advice from Wayne Barrett, the Executive Director of the Seattle Ethics and Elections Commission. The proposed changes would require Councilmembers to disclose potential financial interests in legislation before voting, contrasting with current rules allowing the SEEC to recommend recusal. This shift aims to clarify the distinction between financial interests that require recusal and those that do not. For example, Councilmember Maritza Rivera may need to recuse herself from voting on landlord-tenant legislation due to her rental income, a situation not previously addressed under current guidelines. Some critics argue that these changes could weaken the City’s ethics standards, while supporters believe it could lead to a more equitable ethics code. The SEEC has struggled with drawing clear lines around recusal, as evidenced by past cases where Councilmembers faced no recusal recommendations despite potential conflicts. The outcome of this proposal could significantly impact how Councilmembers navigate conflicts of interest in their legislative responsibilities, shaping future governance in Seattle. Ultimately, the Council's decision on this matter will influence public trust in local governance.